From the Firm

The Growing Problem of Short Term Rentals

A particularly vexing problem for homeowner associations is the growth of Airbnb, VRBO, and similar short-term rental arrangements that bring a series of transient vacationers into a residential community.  Associations and the courts have struggled with how to respond to this phenomenon and balance the desires of a community against the proclaimed right of an individual homeowner to utilize his property as he sees fit.  Two recent decisions of the Texas Courts of Appeals highlight the problem and illustrate the need for Associations to regularly review Deed Restrictions and amend them to respond to new challenges.

In Zgabay v. NBRC Property Owners Association, the Austin Court of Appeals was asked whether a restrictive covenant requiring that properties be used only “for single family residential purposes” prohibited short term rentals.  2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 9100 (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 28, 2015, pet. denied).  The Court held that it did not.  The Court noted that association deed restrictions permitted homeowners to post signs advertising their homes for sale or lease.  Thus, notwithstanding anything else under the deed restrictions, it was clear that “leasing of homes” was permissible under the covenants.  Id., at *5.  The question then became whether the deed restrictions imposed a duration on a lease-term.  Id., at **5–6.  Finding nothing in the deed restrictions that required a minimum lease term, the Court found in favor of the homeowner.  Id., at *8.

A different decision was reached by the San Antonio Court of Appeals.  In Tarr v. Timberwood Park Owners Association, the Court held that a deed restriction providing that properties in the community could be “used solely for residential purposes” prohibited short-term rental arrangements.  No. 04-16-00022-CV, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 12245 (Nov. 16, 2016, pet. filed).  The homeowner argued that since nothing in the deed restrictions prohibited leasing on a long-term basis, the deed restrictions could not be fairly read to prohibit short term leasing.  The Court disagreed.  It held that “residence” “generally requires both physical presence and an intention to remain.”  Id., at *9 (quoting Munson v. Milton, 948 S.W.2d 813, 816 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, writ denied).  “Thus, ‘[i]f a person comes to a place temporarily, without any intention of making that place his or her home, that place is not considered the person’s residence.”  Id. (quoting Munson, 948 S.W.2d at 817).  The Court reasoned that because there is “a distinction between ‘residential’ purposes and ‘transient’ purposes[,] . . . [o]ne leasing his home to be used for transient purposes is not complying with the restrictive covenant that it be used solely for residential purposes.”  Id.; see also Benard v. Humble, 990 S.W.2d 929 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 1999, pet. denied) (same).

The Tarr case is presently on appeal to the Texas Supreme Court; if the Supreme Court takes up the case, it should provide critical guidance to homeowners and community associations on this critical issue.

Shannon A. Lang

Lang & Associates, PLLC

Committed to the law. Dedicated to our clients. Our attorneys are here to help guide you through it all.

Z

Trust

At Lang & Associates, we provide our clients with the experience and professional capabilities of a "Biglaw" firm while providing the personal service and attention of a small firm. Our record of success reflects our ability to manage and try complex cases and provide sophisticated counsel and advice to our clients.

Z

Knowledge

The attorneys at Lang & Associates are licensed in multiple states and have a continual presence in both state and federal courts. Our familiarity with the “ins and outs” of local and federal rules and procedures enables us to serve as a comprehensive resource for all types of litigation. We are a leader in the marketplace for the breadth and scope of our legal services and the quality and commitment of our attorneys.

Z

Ability

Talent, skill, and proficiency allow the team at Lang & Associates to easily navigate through the litigation process in the most efficient and cost-effective manner for each client. We pride ourselves on finding creative solutions to difficult problems and will never recommend a course of action just because it will increase our fees.

Z

Confidentiality

Confidentiality is one of the core values of our practice at Lang & Associates. It is our ethical duty to protect the privacy of our clients when they share information with us. We take this responsibility very seriously and diligently maintain the security and privacy of all client information.

Z

Communication

Our firm is unique in that we care about each client's individual needs, not just his or her legal needs. When it comes to our clients, we believe in open lines of communication and responsiveness. We are dedicated to advising our clients at every stage of the process. By helping clients address and anticipate challenges, our lawyers are able to guide them to make informed economic decisions each step of the way.

Z

Integrity

Lang & Associates prides itself on a standard of excellence that is deeply rooted in integrity, ethics, and professionalism. We are dedicated to making a positive impact on our clients' businesses and lives. We are committed to doing the right thing, at the right time, for every client served.

Look no further. Get started today.